Hybrid Transobturator Tape Versus Conventional Synthetic Tape for Stress Urinary Incontinence

Hybrid Transobturator Tape Versus Conventional Synthetic Tape: A Randomized Controlled Trial Assessing Safety, Efficacy, and Female Sexual Function

Registry ID
NCT07762300
Source registry
NCT
Status
RECRUITING
Phase
NA
Study type
INTERVENTIONAL
Sponsor
Benha University
Enrollment
90
Start date
2026-07-01
Completion date
2027-03-01
Last update
2026-08-13

Conditions

Summary

This randomized controlled trial compares the safety, efficacy, and impact on female sexual function of a novel hybrid transobturator tape (combining an autologous rectus fascia strip with a polypropylene mesh) versus standard synthetic transobturator tape in women undergoing surgery for stress urinary incontinence.

Interventions

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion Criteria: * Female patients suffering from genuine stress urinary incontinence. * Failed conservative management (pelvic floor exercises, medical therapy) * Written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria: * Mixed urinary incontinence with predominant urge component. * High-grade pelvic organ prolapse (POP-Q Stage \>= II), which required surgical intervention. * Neurogenic bladder or voiding dysfunction (Post-void residual \> 100 ml). * Coagulopathy or active urinary tract infection. * Patients who underwent recent pelvic radiotherapy. * Previous incontinence surgery (recurrent cases).

Primary outcomes

[{"measure":"Incidence of mesh-related complications (including vaginal erosion, extrusion, and chronic groin pain).","timeFrame":"Assessed at 6 months postoperatively."}]

Locations

Publications

Related clinical trials

View on source registry